JlEMORANDUM DECISIONS.
223
AMES v. AMERICAN LOAN & TRUST 00. (01reult COurt otAppeals, Ninth CIrcuit. September 16, 1895.) No. 240. Appeal trom the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. Edward P. Sanborn and Zera Snow. for appellant. Dolph, Nixon & Dolph, for appellee. Dismissed, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
THE LOUIS OLSEN. (Olrcult Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 7, 1894.) No. 125. Appeal trom the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. . No opinion. Dismissed, pursuant to subdivision 3 of rule 22 and rule 28 (47 Fed. x.) NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. HEMPEY. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Clrcult. May 4, 1894.) No. 173. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Washing-
ton.
Charles K. Jenner, for defendant In error. Atlirmed, per stipulation. PACIFIC MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. NIXON. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 26, 1894.) No. 99. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of WashingCharles N. Fox, for plaintiff In error. W. S. Relfe, for defendant In error. Dismissed, per stipUlation.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MOTOR ROAD CO. v. UNION LOAN & TRUST CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 3, 1894.). No. 136. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. R. E. Houghton, for appellant. Stephen M. White, for appellee. Dismissed, on motion of counsel for appellant.
224
FEDE1tA.L' REPORTER,
vol. 71.
WA'l'ERLOO MIN. CO. v. DOE. (OircultCourt of Anneals, Klnth Circuit.' February 28, 189M No. 144. Appeal. from the· Circuit Court of the United States for the Southem' District of California. A. H. Rickets, for appellant. R. E. Houghton, for appellee. Dismissed, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
WILLIAMS v. SNYDER. (Circuit Court on Appeals, Ninth CirCUit. July 15, 1895.) No. 241. Appeal trom the Circuit Court' of the United states for the District Of Idaho. W. W. Woods, for appellant. C. W. Beale, for appellee. Dismissed, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
YE.E J;UNG, v. UNITED STATES·. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 23, 1894.) No. 177. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern trict of California. . T. D. Riordan, L. I. Mowry, and H. C. Dibble, for appellant. Charles A. Garter, U. S. Atty. No opinion. Submission of appeal vacated, and judgment of dismissal entered by consent.