'MEMORANDUM ',DECISIONS.
65G
THE MARY McWILLIAMS A.ND THE CITY Oll' BROCKTON. McWILLIAMS et at v. DELAWARE &8. CANAL CO. (Circuit Court ot Appeals, Second Circuit. October 30, 1894.) Appeal from the Circuit Court ot the United States for the Southem 011trict of New York. Carpenter & Mosher, for claimants ot the Mary McWllllams and appellants. S. Hanford, for claimants of the City of Brockton aD!l appellee. David Willcox, for libelants and appellees. . Stricken from calendar for fallure to answer call of docket, pursuant to tIle ..venteenth rule. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK et at v. WORKMAN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 6, 1895.) No. 118. Appeal trom the Dlmrlct Court of the United States tor the SouthemDI8trlct of New York. Application for certification to the supreme court ot the United Statell. U. nled. NEW YORK & H.R.R. CO. v. ACCUMULATOR CO. (Olrcuit Court ot Appeals, Second CIrcuit. March 13,1893.)
Appeal trom the CIrcuit Court of the United Statel tor the Southern DIItrlct ot New York. W. H. Kenyon, for appellant. Frederick H. Betts, for appellee. Stricken from the calendar for tallure to answer the call ot the .,pursuant to the seventeenth rule.
PRESS PUB. CO. v. FALK. (Circuit Oourt ot Appeals, Second Circuit. No. 27. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States tor the Southem DII'trlct of New York. Platt & Bowers, fOJ: complainant and appellant. BennQ Lewinson, for defendant and appellee. Dismissed by consent. November IS, 1894."
.
PROVIDENT FUND SOC. v. WILLIAMS. (Olrcult Court ot Appeals, Second, Circuit. March 13, 1895.) Appeal. from the Circuit Court ot the United States tor the SoutherD DI"'" ·.t rlct ot New York. A. M. Sanders, for appellant. Carter, Hughes & Kellogg, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, pursuant to the stxteenth rule.
656
.J'EDERAL REPORTER,
vol. 69.
In re SPOFFORD. (Circuit Court or Appeals, Second Circuit. No. 47. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Miller, Peckham & Dixon, for appellant. Root & Clarke, for petitioner. Appeal dismissed by consent. December 10, 1894.)
STATE OF WASHINGTON v. MORRISON. (Circuit Court or Appeals, Ninth Circuit. No. 236. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington. Chas. Page, for appellees. Case docketed and dismissed on motion of counsel for appellees. June .i4, 1895.)
TRAVERS v. AMERICAN CORDAGE CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 7, 1894.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern DIstrict of New York. Briesen &. Knauth, for appellant. Betts, H;}'de & Betts, for appellee. Discontinued by consent. THE VOLUNTEER. MURRAY et aI. v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. No. 23Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New Yo"rk. W. W. Goodrich, for claimants and appellants. Henry W. Taft, for libelant and appellee. Before WALLACE and LACOMBE, Circuit Judges, and TOWNSEND, DIstrict Judge. No opinion. Affirmed. YUCU v. McCAR'l'HY, United States MarshaL (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 6, 1895.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. G. M. Curtis, for appellant. Wallace Macfarlane, for appellees. NQ opinion. Appeal dismissed, pursuant to the sixteenth rule. November 14, 1894.)