145 F3d 1346 Robinson v. Cain

145 F.3d 1346

98 CJ C.A.R. 1973

Betestia ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Judy CAIN, The Oklahoma State Employment Commission; Kathy
Harris, the Department of Human Resource; Karla
Turley, Travelers Express Company,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 98-7000.
(D.C.No. 97-CV-472-BU)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 21, 1998.

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

1

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

PORFILIO

2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

3

Betestia Robinson appeals the dismissal on statute of limitations and procedural grounds of her purported civil rights complaint. Our examination of the briefs and the record indicates the district court did not err. The judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of dismissal dated December 3, 1997.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3