141 F3d 1173 Rosemarie Beale v. GTE-California

141 F.3d 1173

Rosemarie BEALE; Yvonne Boling; Lois Branham; Tina Maria
Brison; Brenda Coplin; Murray Coventry; Patricia Ann
Dhuy; Clennis Frederick; Cynthia Giles-Hunn; Milvie Gore;
Loistine Herndon; Ellen Hoppe; Bonita Irby; Irene
Izquierdo; Julia Lary; Mary Deborah Lowder; Patricia
McCall; Evernell Shaw; Penelope Ann Swift; Terry Wangler;
Pauline Wycoff,
v.
GTE-California, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-56850.
D.C. No. CV-95-04140-KMW-JGx.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Mar. 6, 1998**.
Decided Mar. 11, 1998.

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Kim McLane Wardlaw, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

We affirm Judge Wardlaw's Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment for the reasons stated therein.

3

AFFIRMED.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3